Posts Tagged ‘Flourishing’

image

The next is a common code of conduct while bearing witness. Since in all world religions some version of the Golden Rule is central to their moral code, I have argued in Allah: A Christian Response that it should serve as the basis for an ethics of witness. In the version Jesus gave it, the Golden Rule is universal in application: “In everything, do to others as you would have them do to you” (Matthew 7:12). “Everything” includes witness.
Two basic rules follow:
(1) bear witness to your religion in the way you believe others should witness to you, and
(2) as you bear witness to your own religion, be prepared to let others witness to you.
The two rules don’t state everything we need to know about the shape of responsible witness, but they do invite us to discern what it means to relate appropriately to another person whose claim to respect equals ours.

Miroslav Volf, Flourishing : Why we need religion in a globalized world

A world religion that forcibly prevents a person from embracing another religion and compels a person to remain in a religion unwillingly is inconsistent. When Christians punished apostates and heretics, as they did for much of Christianity’s history, the Christian faith itself was divided. When Muslims insist, as many still do, that “once a person accepts Islam out of his free will he is not allowed to leave it,” Islam, too, at is at odds with itself.
If religion is to be embraced freely, that free choice must obtain throughout the religious life of a person, not just at its beginning.

Miroslav Volf, Flourishing : Why we need religion in a globalized world

image

My main thesis is simple. I can state it in the words that, according to the Hebrew Bible, Moses said to the children of Israel at the end of forty years of wandering in the wilderness and the words that Jesus, weakened after forty days of fasting in the wilderness, hurled at the Tempter in self-defense (Deuteronomy 8:3; Matthew 4:4): “One does not live by bread alone, but by every word that comes from the mouth of the Lord.” The greatest of all temptations isn’t to serve false gods, as monotheists like to think. The greatest of all temptations, equally hard to resist in abundance and in want, is to believe and act as if human beings lived by bread alone, as if their entire lives should revolve around the creation, improvement, and distribution of worldly goods. Serving false gods—or turning the one true God into a mere bread provider, which amounts to the same thing—is the consequence of succumbing to this grand temptation.

When we live by bread alone, there is never enough bread, not enough even when we make so much of it that some of it rots away; when we live by bread alone, someone always goes hungry; when we live by bread alone, every bite we take leaves a bitter aftertaste, and the more we eat the more bitter the taste; when we live by bread alone, we always want more and better bread, as if the bitterness came from the bread itself and not from our living by bread alone. I could continue with the analogy, but you get my point: living by “mundane realities” and for them alone, we remain restless, and that restlessness in turn contributes to competitiveness, social injustice, and the destruction of the environment as well as constitutes a major obstacle to more just, generous, and caring personal practices and social arrangements.

Trying to live by “bread alone” kills both us and our neighbors.33 “Alone” is a key word in the biblical passage and in my thesis: bread alone (or, perhaps, bread above all). For we all live also by bread, and without bread all of us are dead. Still, without the divine Word we shrivel even when we are in overdrive, we fight and destroy, we perish. The Word is the bread of life, and it gives abundant life, as it is suggested in the Torah and written in the Gospels (Deuteronomy 8:1–20; John 6:35, 10:10).

Miroslav Volf, Flourishing : Why we need religion in a globalized world

A very beautiful analogy on the world as cosmos and the world as creation, a picture that made me smile and pounder in Miroslav Volf’s new book, Flourishing: Why we need religion in a globalized world.

image

Consider first the nature of the world. Christians, to stay with the example of my own faith, believe that God is the Creator: “I believe that God has made me and all the creatures,” wrote the Protestant reformer Martin Luther (1483–1546) in his Small Catechism. To claim that God made “all creatures” isn’t to dismiss on the authority of an ancient holy book the findings of modern physical cosmology and evolutionary biology; it is to relate to oneself and to the world in a certain way, as a gift, for instance, rather than merely as a particular form of matter and energy. Imagine an object you very much like, say, a well-designed and skillfully crafted fine leather wallet with a texture you can’t resist touching. Think of yourself, first, in a store examining it as you contemplate whether to purchase it and, second, holding it in your hands after receiving it as a gift from a lover to commemorate your first date. It is the same object, and yet it isn’t: the love between you and your lover is part of how you experience the object, enhancing your appreciation and enjoyment of it. The first is world as cosmos; the second is world as creation.

Miroslav Volf, Flourishing: Why we need religion in a globalized world